Compare Dice payouts and house edge

Pick a win chance setting and see the payout in each operator model. At a nominal 50%, gross payouts range from 1.96x to 1.9982x; roll grids and payout rules explain the difference.

Game settings
Affiliate links · 18+

50% win chance setting · Roll Under

Checked payout rules: BCH.games. Other operators: Reference estimates (see notes below).

Sorted alphabetically. Multipliers are displayed to four decimals; calculations retain full precision.

How each number was obtained

The same nominal chance setting can have slightly different winning probabilities on different roll grids. Return includes the selected model’s multiplier rounding. This is a calculation comparison, not a casino ranking or a settlement check.

BC.Game: Reference estimate: 98% nominal return with four-decimal downward payout rounding, consistent with captured payouts. Full payout rules are not confirmed.

BCH.games: Checked payout rules. Currency settlement excluded.

Duel.com: Reference estimate: 0.1% base-tier edge and four-decimal payout, matching captured Over 50.05. Other targets are model estimates. Higher stake tiers and cashback excluded. Larger stakes can use different payout tiers.

Duelbits: Reference: announced multiplier formula. Interval boundaries use half-open ranges; boundary settlement and currency settlement are not confirmed.

Stake: Reference: public client payout formula and display rounding. Server settlement is not confirmed.

What the Dice comparison shows

Common crypto Dice bets win when a roll falls below or above a target. The chance determines how often a bet wins; the payout determines how much is returned. At an exact 50% win probability, a 2% house edge gives a 1.96x gross payout, while a 1% edge gives 1.98x. Gross payout includes the stake. Different roll grids and rounding can make a nominal percentage differ slightly from the exact probability.

The comparison shows each operator model’s payout and return at the chance setting you choose. It does not rank casinos. Account terms, regional availability, withdrawals and support are separate questions that a payout formula cannot answer. Operators are listed alphabetically, so position is not a recommendation.

Dice house edge by casino

Default comparison: 50% setting, Roll Under, BC.Game Dice98
OperatorModel returnModel house edgeGross payoutEvidence
BC.Game (Dice98)98.00%2.00%1.96xReference estimate; Verified roll replay
BCH.games98.00%2.00%1.96xChecked payout rules; Verified roll replay
Duel.com (base tier)99.90%0.10%1.9982xReference base-tier estimate; Verified roll replay
Duelbits99.01%0.99%1.9802xAnnounced multiplier formula; Reference
Stake98.99%1.01%1.98xPublic client formula; Reference
Rounded display values. The live comparison uses the selected settings. Calculations use full-precision probabilities and model payouts, including payout-rule rounding. Cashback and currency settlement are outside scope.

Why Stake shows 98.99%, not 99%. Its supported mapping has results from 0.00 to 100.00. Under 50 wins on 5,000 of 10,001 values: about 49.995%. The client formula pays 1.98x for the nominal 50% setting, so calculated return is about 98.99%. The calculation counts the actual 32-bit mapping. The Duel.com base-tier estimate prices the 10,001-value grid and rounds the payout to four decimals, giving about 99.90% return. This remains a model estimate beyond the captured target.

Why BC.Game can show 97.99%. The Dice98 estimate rounds payouts down to four decimals, consistent with the captured examples. At a 90% setting, 0.98 ÷ 0.9 is about 1.08889x; rounding down gives 1.0888x and 97.992% return. This illustrates the model convention, rather than confirming every live target. Duelbits uses the announced formula 100 ÷ (chance percent × 1.01); its displayed multiplier is rounded to four decimals here.

What the difference costs

Expected loss = total wagered × effective house edge. Total wagered means every stake placed, not just the initial deposit. At a fixed return, changing win chance changes the swings rather than the cost per unit wagered; grid effects and payout rounding can change the effective edge slightly.

Illustrative expected loss at fixed house edges
Total wagered2% edge1% edge0.1% edge
$100$2.00$1.00$0.10
$1,000$20.00$10.00$1.00
$10,000$200.00$100.00$10.00
These are exact-edge illustrations, not identical effective returns for every operator setting.

Expected loss is an average, not a prediction for one session. If all 1,000 independent bets of one unit can be funded, a roughly 50% chance setting gives about a 25% chance of finishing ahead at a 2% edge, about 36% at 1%, and about 49% at 0.1%. These binomial examples exclude early stopping and funding limits. Use the Dice simulator to explore the wider spread under a selected bankroll.

Compare at the same win chance, not the same target

Operators use different result ranges, including 0.00–99.99 and 0.00–100.00. Copying a target of 50 therefore need not copy the exact probability. Start with the same nominal win chance, then read the model’s grid and payout rules. The comparison does not claim the actual probabilities are identical.

Roll Over and Roll Under can describe equivalent winning counts when their thresholds are adjusted for the grid. A visual target such as Over 75 is not universally interchangeable with Under 25. The shared comparison is limited to 0.01–97.99% to stay within the supported BCH.games settings; this is not a claim that every other operator uses those same limits.

Low edge, cashback and rakeback

Cashback or rakeback can return part of wagering costs later under an operator’s terms. It does not change the probability of a roll. Rebates can depend on VIP level, eligibility or stake size. This comparison uses gross game return before cashback. Duel.com’s model covers the base tier; larger stakes can use different payout tiers.

Payout comparison is not fairness proof

A payout describes the return for a winning bet. Provably fair evidence tests whether a recorded result follows from disclosed seeds and the supported algorithm. BC.Game, BCH.games and Duel.com have Verified roll replay adapters within their documented scopes; Stake and Duelbits are Reference. Neither status confirms a complete payout profile or casino safety. Choose the matching Dice verifier for your recorded bet.

Related: Compare Plinko · Dice calculator · Dice strategy · House edge explained · Methodology

FAQ

Which crypto casino has the lowest Dice house edge?

Among the models compared here, Duel.com’s captured base-tier example supports an estimated edge of about 0.1% before cashback. Larger stakes can use different tiers. Stake and Duelbits are around 1%; the BC.Game estimates and checked BCH.games rules use a nominal 2%. These figures have different evidence scopes.

Does the win chance change the house edge?

Changing the chance mainly changes win frequency and payout size. Under a fixed-return model the edge stays the same, but discrete roll grids and multiplier rounding can cause small differences between settings.

Why are some numbers Reference estimates?

We label payout rules as checked only when the supported rules have been confirmed. Reference estimates use published client arithmetic or assumptions consistent with recorded payouts. They do not establish every target, live payout tier or currency settlement.

Is the casino with the highest payout the best one?

The highest return means the lowest expected cost within the selected model. It does not establish overall casino quality. Regional availability, deposit and withdrawal terms and support are separate questions; operator profiles list the restrictions we recorded.

Does a betting strategy change these numbers?

Martingale and other staking progressions change turnover and the distribution of wins and losses. They do not improve the expected return per unit wagered at the same rules and settings.